Separate people views
Distinguish application membership from site-worker records.
Maintain supported site-worker records separately from application users, then use the same canonical workers in daily attendance.

An invited staff member needs role-based access. A worker recorded on the daily roster needs an operational worker record. Mixing them confuses access and attendance.
Each step keeps the record, its context and the next responsibility visible.
Use app users for access and site workers for the operational roster.
Add or update only supported worker details.
Keep the worker available in the relevant site context.
Mark the canonical worker through the existing daily roster.
Focused capabilities for the complete workflow, described within their supported operating boundaries.
Distinguish application membership from site-worker records.
Maintain the operational information exposed by the current contract.
Use worker records with supported site and attendance workflows.
Only authorised roles can maintain the worker directory.


Current evidence shows the site-worker roster and the roles reference that governs access to supported people workflows.
The feature supports the handoff without blurring who records, reviews or receives the information.
Keep staff access and worker records understandable.
Maintain supported site-worker information and assignment context.
Use the current workers in the daily roster.
NIYAM keeps the supported directory and attendance connection. Sensitive workforce decisions remain subject to the business’s authorised process.
Straight answers about scope, review and responsibility.
Not necessarily. App users have workspace access; site workers are separate operational records used by supported people and attendance workflows.
No. The Starter experience reuses the canonical worker records and APIs.
No. Worker actions continue to follow existing role and workspace permissions.