Keep worker identity, attendance and supervisor review in one register.
The workbook includes a clean attendance register, controlled status options and an example that shows how corrections and review notes should remain visible.
Built for: Site supervisors and labour coordinators
Know what you are downloading.
The workbook contains more guidance and fields; this table shows the record’s practical shape.
| Worker ID | Name | Trade | Status | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W-018 | Ravi K. | Electrician | Present | Reviewed |
| W-041 | Salim A. | Helper | Leave | Reviewed |
Every column has a job.
Adapt the wording when needed, but keep the reporting boundary and responsibility clear.
Worker identity
Stable worker ID, name, trade and employer.
Attendance boundary
Site, date and shift.
Status
Controlled present, absent, leave or not-scheduled value.
Time context
Optional check-in and check-out where required.
Correction note
Reason for a change after initial marking.
Supervisor review
Reviewer and review status for the attendance set.
A simple operating sequence
Start with the clean sheet and keep the completed example as a reference.
- 1
Confirm the worker list
Remove duplicate and inactive identities before marking.
- 2
Mark one site and shift
Avoid mixing attendance boundaries in an unlabeled register.
- 3
Review exceptions
Check missing workers, unusual entries and late corrections.
- 4
Pass on a reviewed input
Keep payroll or contractual decisions separate.
Review the record
- IDs are stable
- Site, date and shift are present
- Statuses use the approved list
- Late edits have reasons
- Supervisor review is visible
- The sheet is not treated as final payroll
Understand the method and the connected workflow.
Use only complete, live resources.
Clear answers before you download.
The file is editable, direct and deliberately limited to an operating starting point.
Does the workbook calculate wages?
No. It deliberately keeps attendance separate from rate, overtime and payroll decisions.
Can one register cover several sites?
The site field supports combined records, but operational review is clearer when each view is filtered or separated by site and shift.
How are status errors corrected?
Change the value through the approved process and record the reason and reviewer instead of silently replacing history.