Unified attention queue
See supported pending record types without duplicating them.
Approvals and audit history
Put supported decisions in one permission-controlled queue.
Review DPR, expense, material, payment and report records with their evidence, current state and recorded decision history.
The decision gap
An approval is weak when the source and current state are unclear.
Decision-makers need the record, evidence, permitted action and prior state together—not a message asking for an unexplained yes or no.
A clear path from capture to responsible action.
Each step keeps the record, its context and the next responsibility visible.
- 01
Create the source record
Use the canonical DPR, expense, material, payment or report workflow.
- 02
Submit for decision
Move the valid supported record to the permitted approval state.
- 03
Review context
Inspect evidence, money, site, status and history where supported.
- 04
Decide explicitly
Approve or reject with confirmation and retain the recorded outcome.
What construction approvals covers.
Focused capabilities for the complete workflow, described within their supported operating boundaries.
Evidence beside decision
Review available source material in the decision context.
Permission control
Expose only the actions allowed for the current role and state.
Recorded history
Retain supported decisions and workflow state changes.
Canonical decisions
Expense and material decisions appear in the same attention centre.
The current evidence shows pending expense and material records while the Finance Inbox retains its own operational composition.
- No duplicate source record
- Permission- and state-aware actions
- Recorded decision history
A useful record has a responsible next person.
The feature supports the handoff without blurring who records, reviews or receives the information.
Owner or Admin
Decide the supported high-responsibility records permitted to the role.
Project manager
Review supported site and material decisions in context.
Accountant
Submit and follow supported finance records without bypassing approval.
Decision responsibility
An audit trail is useful evidence; it is not a compliance certification.
NIYAM records supported decisions and states. The authorised person remains accountable for the decision and its organisational consequences.
- No autonomous approval
- Duplicate decisions are protected
- Only supported record types participate
Questions about construction approvals.
Straight answers about scope, review and responsibility.
Which records can use Approvals?
Supported DPR, expense, material, payment and report records can enter their current permission-controlled decision paths.
Can a direct URL bypass the approval permission?
No. The current server and route guards continue to enforce role, workspace and record-state access.
Does recorded history certify compliance?
No. It provides operational evidence of supported state and decisions, not a compliance certification.